ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LEGAL TECHNOLOGY IN LAW SCHOOLS: UZBEKISTAN AND CENTRAL ASIA IN GLOBAL COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34920/phe.2026.19.04Ключевые слова:
TSUL LegalTech Laboratory, Lex.uz, artificial intelligence, Central Asia, AI literacy, Three-Pillar FrameworkАннотация
The growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) and legal technology (LegalTech) is changing what lawyers do and what skills they need. However, law schools have responded to these changes at different speeds. While institutions in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Europe have already introduced new courses and programs, many law schools in Central Asia - especially in Uzbekistan - are only beginning to address these developments.
This article explores the main challenges and opportunities for legal education in Uzbekistan and the wider Central Asian region, placing this discussion in a global comparative context. Drawing on theories of experiential learning, competency-based education, and technology ethics, and grounded in three embedded case studies from Uzbekistan - the e-SUD electronic court system, the TSUL LegalTech Laboratory, and the Lex.uz national legal database. The article proposes a Three-Pillar Framework for curriculum reform: Technological Literacy, Critical Legal Reasoning in the Age of AI, and Ethical Governance.
The article argues that although Central Asian law schools face structural challenges - including limited LegalTech markets, language barriers, and post-Soviet institutional legacies - they also hold a latecomer advantage: the opportunity to integrate AI literacy from the outset, rather than retrofitting it onto established but outdated models. The methodology combines theoretical analysis, comparative institutional analysis, policy document review, and secondary empirical data to substantiate its conclusions.
Библиографические ссылки
Barton, B. H., & Bibas, S. (2017). Rebooting Justice: More Technology, Fewer Lawyers, and the Future of Law. Encounter Books.
Calo, R. (2017). Artificial intelligence policy: A primer and roadmap. UC Davis Law Review, 51(2), 399–435.
Citron, D. K. (2008). Technological due process. Washington University Law Review, 85(6), 1249–1313.
DataReportal. (2025). Digital 2025: Uzbekistan. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2025-uzbekistan
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Macmillan.
European Parliament. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Act. Official Journal of the European Union.
Fenwick, M., Kaal, W. A., & Vermeulen, E. P. M. (2018). Regulation tomorrow: What happens when technology is faster than the law? American University Business Law Review, 6(3), 561–594.
Gazeta.uz. (2025, August 23). Uzbekistan to introduce the Digital Court system and cut paperwork in courts. Retrieved from https://www.gazeta.uz/en/2025/08/23/courts/
Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2020). Digital Uzbekistan 2030 Strategy. Presidential Decree No. PD-4996. Tashkent.
Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2020). On Additional Measures for the Radical Improvement of Legal Education and Science in the Republic of Uzbekistan. Presidential Decree No. PF-5987. Tashkent.
Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2024). Strategy for the Development of Artificial Intelligence Technologies until 2030. Presidential Resolution No. PP-358 (October 14, 2024). Tashkent.
Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2024). Digital Transformation and E-Government Progress Report. Government Portal of Uzbekistan. Retrieved from https://gov.uz/en
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall.
Levin, I., & Mamluk, O. (2020). Legal education in post-Soviet states: Path dependencies and reform trajectories. Law & Society Review, 54(3), 712–745.
Lex.uz. (2025). National Database of Legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan / AI Legal Research Module. Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Retrieved from https://ai.lex.uz
Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2023). Annual Report on Legal System Digitalization. Tashkent: Ministry of Justice.
Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford University Press.
OECD. (2023). AI in Government: Opportunities and Challenges for Central Asia. OECD Publishing.
Pasquale, F. (2015). The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press.
Remus, D., & Levy, F. (2017). Can robots be lawyers? Computers, lawyers, and the practice of law. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 30(3), 501–558.
Susskind, R. (2023). Tomorrow’s Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Tashkent State University of Law (TSUL). (2023). International Cyberlaw Week: Launch of AI and LegalTech Curriculum. Retrieved from https://tsul.uz/en/news/566
Tashkent State University of Law (TSUL). (2024). Strategic Development Plan 2024–2028. TSUL Press.
Tashkent State University of Law (TSUL). (2026, April 30). The Ministry of Justice, KOICA, and TSUL will digitalize legal services. Retrieved from https://tsul.uz/en
UNDP Uzbekistan. (2022). Access to Justice and Legal Aid in Uzbekistan: Assessment and Recommendations. United Nations Development Program.
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
United Nations Uzbekistan. (2014). Enhancing Court Openness and Accessibility through the e-SUD E-Justice System. Retrieved from http://www.un.uz/eng/pages/display/enhancing-court-openness
USAID. (2022). Rule of Law Partnership in Uzbekistan: Project Fact Sheet. U.S. Agency for International Development. Retrieved from https://www.usaid.gov/uzbekistan/fact-sheets/rule-law-partnership-uzbekistan
Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136.