AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH TO DEVELOPING COMMUNICATION SKILLS

AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH TO DEVELOPING COMMUNICATION SKILLS

Authors

  • Farangiz Salokhojaeva Tashkent State University of Economics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34920/phe.2026.19.05

Keywords:

communicative competencies, foreign language learning, Interdisciplinary

Abstract

This material reflects modern educational trends that require an interdisciplinary approach and are focused on developing 21st-century skills. The article examines the possibility of integrating various disciplines into the development of individual communicative competencies. It analyzes existing practices, highlights key pedagogical principles, and provides recommendations for building successful communications through an interdisciplinary approach.

Author Biography

Farangiz Salokhojaeva, Tashkent State University of Economics

Senior Lecturer, Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent, Uzbekistan;

Field of Specialization: Development of students’ communicative competence using STEAM technologies (using foreign language teaching as an example)

References

References:

Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for understanding. In Handbook of Research on Teaching the English Language Arts. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1182597

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.20

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Cooperation and the use of technology in the classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(3), 227-246. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/243671476_Cooperation_and_the_use_of_technology amazon.com

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation. https://www.sciepub.com/reference/195851

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Kappa Delta Pi. http://ed100shutkin.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/61130259/Dewey_Ex&Ed_1938.pdf

Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and Researching Motivation. Pearson Education. https://ia801206.us.archive.org/31/items/ilhem_20151031_1015/%5BZolt%C3%A1n_D%C3%B6rnyei%2C_Ema_Ushioda%5D_Teaching_and_Resea.pdf

Moore, M. G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical Principles of Distance Education. Routledge. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ918904.pdf

Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: Routledge. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=631566

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2007). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking. https://www.criticalthinking.org/files/Concepts_Tools.pdf

Brookfield, S. D. (2012). Teaching for Critical Thinking: Tools and Techniques to Help Students Question Their Assumptions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292882652_Teaching_for_critical_thinking

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/unf_research/53/

Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture. New York: Anchor Books.

Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term. London & New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9780203964309/rethinking-assessment-higher-education-david-boud-nancy-falchikov

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228621906_Formative_Assessment_and_Self-Regulated_Learning_A_Model_and_Seven_Principles_of_Good_Feedback_Practice

Additional Files

Published

2026-09-26